| # |
subject
|
title
|
description
|
|
| 1 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
Natural Selection acts exclusively by the preservation and accumulation of variations, which are beneficial under the organic and inorganic conditions to which each creature is exposed at all periods of life.
The ultimate result is that each creature tends to become more and more improved in relation to its conditions.
This improvement inevitable leads to the gradual advancement of the organisation of the greater number of living beings throughout the world.
But here we enter on a very intricate subject, for naturalists have not defined to each other's satisfaction what is meant by an advance in organisation.
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 2 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
Amongst the vertebrata the degree of intellect and an approach in structure to man clearly come into play.
It might be thought that the amount of change which the various parts and organs pass through in their development from the embryo to maturity would suffice as a standard of comparison; but there are cases, as with certain parasitic crustaceans, in which several parts of the structure become less perfect, so that the mature animal cannot be called higher than its larva.
 | | embryo |
Von Baer's standard seems the most widely applicable and the best, namely, the amount of differentiation of the parts of the same organic being, in the adult state as I should be inclined to add, and their specialisation for different functions; or, as Milne Edwards would express it, the completeness of the division of physiological labour.
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 3 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
But we shall see how obscure this subject is if we look, for instance, to fishes, amongst which some naturalists rank those as highest which, like the sharks, approach nearest to amphibians; whilst other naturalists rank the common bony or teleostean fishes as the highest, inasmuch as they are most strictly fish-like and differ most from the other vertebrate classes.
 | | shark |
We see still more plainly the obscurity of the subject by turning to plants, amongst which the standard of intellect is of course quite excluded; and here some botanists rank those plants as highest which have every organ, as sepals, petals, stamens, and pistils, fully developed in each flower; whereas other botanists, probably with more truth, look at the plants which have their several organs much modified and reduced in number as the highest.
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 4 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
If we take as the standard of high organisation, the amount of differentiation and specialisation of the several organs in each being when adult (and this will include the advancement of the brain for intellectual purposes), natural selection clearly leads towards this standard: for all physiologists admit that the specialisation of organs, inasmuch as in this state they perform their functions better, is an advantage to each being; and hence the accumulation of variations tending towards specialisation is within the scope of natural selection.
On the other hand, we can see, bearing in mind that all organic beings are striving to increase at a high ratio and to seize on every unoccupied or less well occupied place in the economy of nature, that it is quite possible for natural selection gradually to fit a being to a situation in which several organs would be superfluous or useless: in such cases there would be retrogression in the scale of
organisation.
 | | appendix |
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 5 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
Whether organisation on the whole has actually advanced from the remotest geological periods to the present day will be more conveniently discussed in our chapter on Geological Succession.
But it may be objected that if all organic beings thus tend to rise in the scale, how is it that throughout the world a multitude of the lowest forms still exist; and how is it that in each great class some forms are far more highly developed than others?
Why have not the more highly developed forms everywhere supplanted and exterminated the lower?
Lamarck, who believed in an innate and inevitable tendency towards perfection in all organic beings, seems to have felt this difficulty so strongly, that he was led to suppose that new and simple forms are continually being produced by spontaneous generation.
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 6 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
Science has not as yet proved the truth of this belief, whatever the future may reveal.
On our theory the continued existence of lowly organisms offers no difficulty; for natural selection, or the survival of the fittest, does not necessarily include progressive development- it only takes advantage of such variations as arise and are beneficial to each creature under its complex relations of life.
And it may be asked what advantage, as far as we can see, would it be to an infusorian animalcule- to an intestinal
worm- or even to an earthworm, to be highly organised.
 | | earthworm |
If it were no advantage, these forms would be left, by natural selection, unimproved or but little improved, and might remain for indefinite ages in their present lowly condition.
And geology tells us that some of the lowest forms, as the infusoria and rhizopods, have remained for an enormous period in nearly their present state.
 | | rhizopod |
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 7 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
But to suppose that most of the many now existing low forms have not in the least advanced since the first dawn of life would be extremely rash; for every naturalist who has dissected some of the beings now ranked as very low in the scale, must have been struck with their really wondrous and beautiful organisation.
Nearly the same remarks are applicable if we look to the different grades of organisation within the same great group; for instance, in the vertebrata, to the co-existence of mammals and fish- amongst mammalia, to the coexistence of man and the Ornithorhynchus- amongst fishes, to the co-existence of the shark and the lancelet (Amphioxus), which latter fish in the extreme simplicity of its structure approaches the invertebrate classes.
 | | Ornithorhynchus |
| | shark |
 | | lancelet |
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 8 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
But mammals and fish hardly come into competition with each other; the advancement of the whole class of mammals, or of certain members in this class, to the highest grade would not lead to their taking the place of fishes.
Physiologists believe that the brain must be bathed by warm blood to be highly active, and this requires aerial respiration; so that warm-blooded mammals when inhabiting the water lie under a disadvantage in having to come continually to the surface to breathe. With fishes, members of the shark family would not tend to supplant the lancelet; for the lancelet, as I hear from Fritz Muller, has as sole companion and competitor on the barren sandy shore of South Brazil, an anomalous annelid.
 | | annelid |
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 9 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
The three lowest orders of mammals, namely, marsupials, edentata, and rodents, co-exist in South America in the same region with numerous monkeys, and probably interfere little with each other.
 | | kangaroo |
 | | armadillo |
 | | rat |
 | | monkey |
 | | South America |
Although organisation, on the whole, may have advanced and be still advancing throughout the world, yet the scale will always present many degrees of perfection; for the high advancement of certain whole classes, or of certain members of each class, does not at all necessarily lead to the extinction of those groups with which they do not enter into close competition.
In some cases, as we shall hereafter see, lowly organised forms appear to have been preserved to the present day, from inhabiting confined or peculiar stations, where they have been subjected to less severe competition, and where their scanty numbers have retarded the chance of favourable variations arising.
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 10 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
Finally, I believe that many lowly organised forms now exist throughout the world, from various causes. In some cases variations or individual differences of a favourable nature may never have arisen for natural selection to act on and accumulate. In no case, probably, has time sufficed for the utmost possible amount of development. In some few cases there has been what we must call retrogression of organisation.
But the main cause lies in the fact that under very simple conditions of life a high organisation would be of no service,- possibly would be of actual disservice, as being of a more delicate nature, and more liable to be put out of order and injured.
Looking to the first dawn of life, when all organic beings, as we may believe, presented the simplest structure, how, it has been asked, could the first steps in the advancement or differentiation of parts have arisen?
Mr. Herbert Spencer would probably answer that, as soon as simple unicellular organism came by growth or division to be compounded of several cells, or became attached to any supporting surface, his law "that homologous units of any order become differentiated in proportion as their relations to incident forces" would come into action. But as we have no facts to guide us, speculation on the subject is almost useless.
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
| 11 |
04 - Natural Selection
|
04-12 - On the Degree to which Organisation tends to advance
|
It is, however, an error to suppose that there would be no struggle for existence, and, consequently, no natural selection, until many forms had been produced: variations in a single species inhabiting an isolated station might be beneficial, and thus the whole mass of individuals might be modified, or two distinct forms might arise.
But, as I remarked towards the close of the Introduction, no one ought to feel surprise at much remaining as yet unexplained on the origin of species, if we make due allowance for our profound ignorance on the mutual relations of the inhabitants of the world at the present time, and still more so during past ages.
|
Edit
|
New
|
Delete
|
